California Domestic Partners – Tax Issues Part 2 of 2

Filing

California permit couples to file joint returns, which is easy – list all the income and expenses of both individuals on one return.

The federal government requires that each spouse file either as a single person or head of household, which means that domestic partners divide and report their income under community property rules; however, there are no lines on the federal tax return to indicate this division.

Problems

The problem arises when one spouse makes $100,000 and the other $15,000. Each is supposed to report $57,500 as income, but IRS computers expect to see W-2 income of $100,000 and $15,000 respectively.

The same issue occurs with Form 1099 information returns (usually independent contractor income) involving community property income.

Consequently, each individual needs to report the full amount of his or her W-2 and information returns on the appropriate lines, then make an adjustment to 50% of the total income for the couple.

Disclosure

Absent rules on how to report community property income and expenses on an individual return, it is probably wise to have a tax professional deal with the issue.

If you want to file yourself, consider making a positive or negative adjusting entry on Form 1040 line 21 (other income) with a statement “community property adjustment” in the explanation portion. Line 61 (federal income tax withheld) should contain the taxes withheld based on an equal division of credits.

There should be a schedule or disclosure form (Form 8275) attached to the back of the Form 1040 that contains the name and social security of the spouse and how the income and tax withholdings were divided between the two tax returns.

Each spouse should make the appropriate adjustment on line 21 (Note: one adjustment will usually be positive and the other negative) with the same explanations and calculations, but with the other spouse’s name and social security number.

Conclusion

Navigating through the community property rules and then matching up the income and credits on two separate tax returns is a royal pain. Remember, marital agreements may be used to overcome the community property presumption, but check with an experienced family law attorney first, since there could be negative ramifications upon separation or divorce.

The retroactive effective date may result in tax refunds for prior years, but you will need to file amended returns for those years to claim any refunds.

California Domestic Partners – Tax Issues, Part 1 of 2

Introduction

Last year, IRS ruled that California registered domestic partners and married same-sex couples must comply with community property laws.

Because federal law does not permit domestic partners to file a joint return, the ruling has caused complexity and confusion as to how federal tax returns should be prepared.

IRS Ruling

IRS specifically ruled that effective January 1, 2007:

1. A taxpayer must report on his individual federal income tax return one-half of the combined income: (a) that taxpayer and domestic partner earn from the performance of personal services; and (b) derived from their community property assets.

2. A taxpayer Is entitled to half of the credits for income tax withholding from the wages of taxpayer and domestic partner.

3. For gift tax purposes, one-half of taxpayer’s earnings is vested in his or her partner; there is not a transfer of property by gift to his or her partner.

The ruling did not require amended returns after 2006, although taxpayers should consider amending returns if advantageous. Also, the ruling did not specify how to report the split in income and credits.

Community Property

The concept of community property is deceptively simple: a married couple is treated as an equal partnership — 50% of the earnings of one spouse belong to the other and vice-versa.

There is a presumption that earnings from personal services generated during the marriage are community property. Couples may overcome the community property presumption through marital agreements.

Title to Assets

In general, the character of real property and financial accounts depends on how title is held. If the assets are in the name of only one of the partners, there is a presumption of separate property. Separate property is reported in full by the taxpayer who owns the asset.

For example, if a residence or rental real estate is owned by one partner, that partner would report all the income and deductions associated with the property.

Wesley Snipes Goes to Jail

Introduction

No, this is not the title of Wesley’s newest movie: A federal court ordered the world-famous actor to start his three-year prison term for failing to file tax returns.

Prior to his conviction, Snipes had the swagger of a typical tax protestor, spouting off frivolous arguments about why he was not subject to the U.S. tax laws. After his trial, his lawyers bragged about their “victory” in securing only misdemeanor convictions.

But in the end, it is off to Club Fed, demonstrating once again, that when it comes to tax protestors, the feds will convict and imprison a big fish, along with the small fry.

Tax Conviction

Snipes received the maximum one year sentence for each of his three misdemeanor convictions. Snipes claimed he was misled by his tax advisors and was arrogant enough to file claims for millions in refunds, even though he paid no tax on $35 million of income during the six-year period involved in the case.

Unsuccessful Appeal

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a scathing 35 page decision, unanimously upholding his conviction and mocking some of his bizarre assertions. The court noted that Snipes used phony tax protester arguments not only for his personal taxes, but with respect to his movie production companies and stopped paying payroll taxes for his employees.

At various times, Sniped claimed he was a “foreign diplomat” and a “fiduciary of God”, and, therefore, not subject to U.S. taxes. The appeals court held that the failure to file tax returns and pay approximately $17 million in taxes supported the district court’s three-year sentence.

Jail

After the Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, the trial court judge ordered Snipes to jail, stating that “The Defendant Snipes had a fair trial; he has had a full, fair, and thorough review of his conviction and sentence by the Court of Appeals; and he has had a full, fair, and thorough review of his present claims, during all of which he has remained at liberty. The time has come for the judgment to be enforced.”

Conclusion:

Snipes is the most famous of a long list of tax protesters who learned the hard way that criminal tax violations inevitably lead to significant prison time, as well as financial ruin.

The Lesson: If a super-action movie hero could not escape the clutches of the IRS and the federal court system, why would a mere mortal attempt it?